LDOspook wrote:I'd like to see everyone's opinions on this. What if the cyber community peeled off to be it's own distinct designator, and the rest of us (sigint/IO), woke up as a piece of the 1830 designator? I'm a proud cryppie, but due to the wider break in our scope of work;think I could live with this. Thoughts?
LDOspook wrote:"Cyber community", the workplaces and people that work in the business of "cyber". I realize that is a pretty large grouping, but what I am getting at is a distinct break in the community iot allow for growth and a future development of a "cadre" that is exclusive to cyber (or SIGINT). I can see how my proposal is somewhat blasphemous, however several of the other services lump sigint into the intel domain, and always have. I love being a cryppie, but I can see a time when it becomes risky to ask Officers to jump between some fairly distinct lanes of expertise. I'm not a cyber guy, so this isn't a pitch for cyber to be it's own community, I'm just curious to the CW wardroom's opinions.
LDOspook wrote:I completely agree with you on the "stomach for change"! I feel sorry for the amount of UIM(s) Sailors have changed out on their uniforms over the last few years!
To be specific, I was thinking more about the 1810 community, however if we look at the "cyber community" as a whole, then we are looking at numerous designators and groups (Officer and Enlisted), and then the entire "Cyber Service" discussion comes into play. Trust me, I have no great to desire to join the intel designator, but when we really look at the numerous work roles that 1810(s) are doing, this idea begins to look sensible. I appreciate the discussion!
Return to Detailer/Community Management Corner
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests