The reason RLs excluded from New Naval Strategy Subspecialty

Re: The reason RLs excluded from New Naval Strategy Subspeci

Postby 12345qwert » Wed Feb 04, 2015 5:32 pm

And... We have progress! Something tells me this will get fixed! Below is the email from OPNAV:

"Thanks for the email and please, don't worry about bothering me. Working to untangle things is one of my job requirements. You are correct that the 2300 ESRs do include non-URL designators. The difference between the ESR document and the NAVADMIN 011/15 regarding 2300 eligibility has not yet been resolved. We are actively engaged with the non-URL communities to determine the best way forward."
  • 0

12345qwert
Registered Member
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 11:34 pm
Reputation: 9

Re: The reason RLs excluded from New Naval Strategy Subspeci

Postby yoshi » Wed Feb 04, 2015 6:32 pm

Awesome work, qwerty! Hopefully, they will make some changes.
  • 0

yoshi
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:10 am
Reputation: 19

Re: The reason RLs excluded from New Naval Strategy Subspeci

Postby LIVINGIW » Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:38 am

We keep pushing this by having 1810s selected to programs like PMM, FEF, WHF, and LEGFELLOW. Then the key is success in this programs and follow on assignments
  • 0

LIVINGIW
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:36 pm
Location: CA
Reputation: 12

Re: The reason RLs excluded from New Naval Strategy Subspeci

Postby 12345qwert » Fri Feb 20, 2015 9:25 pm

Just to close this out, doesn't appear that we should expect resolution on this anytime soon:

My email:

"Just following up on this (was TDY overseas the last two weeks).

Might make the most sense to re-issue the msg to include all of the intended designators (to include non-URLs) in the new subspecialty (since it appears that was the intent)."

OPNAV response:

"We are working with the other communities who are interested in this subspecialty. Once the framework is built, these other communities will distribute information about who is included and how they will use them."
  • 0

12345qwert
Registered Member
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 11:34 pm
Reputation: 9

Re: The reason RLs excluded from New Naval Strategy Subspeci

Postby LIVINGIW » Sun Feb 22, 2015 9:20 pm

I am an 1810 and will do the FEF this year. Happy to let collective know the subspec, aqd, and follow on assignment process/lack of process for a RL in this program. If interested, PM me.
  • 0

LIVINGIW
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:36 pm
Location: CA
Reputation: 12

Re: The reason RLs excluded from New Naval Strategy Subspeci

Postby LIVINGIW » Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:38 pm

Halfway through the FEF. As RL, we will get the AQD, not the subspec. As far as detailing, none of the FEF coded billets are for 18XX Officers, so I worked my follow on with the 1810 community.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 0

LIVINGIW
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:36 pm
Location: CA
Reputation: 12

Re: The reason RLs excluded from New Naval Strategy Subspeci

Postby Wolfpack » Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:06 am

Thanks for the update. Bummer on no changes, but not unexpected.
  • 0

Wolfpack
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:14 am
Location: Wash DC
Reputation: 6

Previous

Return to Navy Information Warfare

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests