Search found 831 matches

Return to advanced search

Re: O-5 Command Results Released?

-we continue to report up to FCC/C10F via WAR as if operations at national sites and in overseas theaters are somehow owned by us. we give this information to someone who is completely powerless to do anything and has no authority to make decisions. and, we continually waste time and effort of our ...
by Sum1
Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:54 pm
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: O-5 Command Results Released?
Replies: 18
Views: 1405

Re: O-6 results

Looking forward to seeing if these topics get brought up at one of the upcoming mid-career course offerings. Maybe I'll toss the turd into the punch bowl and watch the IWC professionals who are likely all smarter than me figure out a solution.
by Sum1
Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:44 pm
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: O-6 results
Replies: 32
Views: 4201

Re: Poll: cyber becomes it's own thing, cryppies become 183

Consolidating cyber into one designator would also help focus personnel utilization on the Reserve side. Right now, all of the 1815 mobilizations are basically either SIGINT or IO planning (and I thought we didn't do IO anymore..?). We haven't had any luck trying to get cyber-focused 1815 officers ...
by Sum1
Thu Jun 01, 2017 7:58 am
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: Poll: cyber becomes it's own thing, cryppies become 1830(s)
Replies: 16
Views: 2872

Re: Poll: cyber becomes it's own thing, cryppies become 183

My thoughts from January 2016 on this subject... More Than a Name Change That post evolved into the opportunity to help write the Cryptologic Community Vision. Has anyone seen the IWC Vision? IP Vision? Intel Vision? Oceano Vision? I remember reading that post and being unsure how to react to it, b...
by Sum1
Mon May 29, 2017 8:52 pm
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: Poll: cyber becomes it's own thing, cryppies become 1830(s)
Replies: 16
Views: 2872

Re: Poll: cyber becomes it's own thing, cryppies become 183

Frankly, I'd advocate for an entirely new service for Cyber (akin to Army, Navy, Air Force, etc.).

We're at the point where I think that would be beneficial.
by Sum1
Wed May 24, 2017 6:57 pm
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: Poll: cyber becomes it's own thing, cryppies become 1830(s)
Replies: 16
Views: 2872

Re: IWDC Warfare Tactics Instructor Specialties Request

Random thoughts: - We aren't building officers specifically to become WTIs, so worrying about the fact that our officer development pipelines don't produce a plethora of people who fit that model shouldn't concern us. Once criteria are settled on, some people will have the right set of experiences a...
by Sum1
Thu May 18, 2017 3:48 pm
 
Forum: Navy Information Warfare
Topic: IWDC Warfare Tactics Instructor Specialties Request
Replies: 9
Views: 1856

Re: O-6 results

Good points. You're saying you can't dress up a turd by painting it in a better light or giving it a fancy name.
by Sum1
Tue May 09, 2017 2:29 pm
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: O-6 results
Replies: 32
Views: 4201

Re: O-6 results

So, is your question really if we're looking to get to success with an IW Afloat model or a CW Afloat model? It seems less like we're adding titles and more like our equities get a seat at the table with the perennial big boys. This assumes that we weren't already adding value afloat..which we were...
by Sum1
Tue May 09, 2017 11:42 am
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: O-6 results
Replies: 32
Views: 4201

Re: O-6 results

So, where is the value added? We have created/shifted an O-6 IW Commander (IWC) billet, added a designated DIWC (senior CDR), but done literally nothing else. Is this how we get to success as an IW Afloat model by adding more titles? I think it's clear that snatching IWC away from the carrier CO an...
by Sum1
Mon May 08, 2017 8:19 pm
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: O-6 results
Replies: 32
Views: 4201

Re: O-6 results

As far as the DIWC position opening to the full IWC instead of 1810s, I'd be hesitant to assign any meaning to that decision beyond the fact that if IWC is open to all, then DIWC should be, as well. I haven't seen anything to confirm or deny this, but making DIWC open to all, as well, means there i...
by Sum1
Mon May 08, 2017 3:43 pm
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: O-6 results
Replies: 32
Views: 4201
PreviousNext

Return to advanced search

cron