Search found 359 matches

Return to advanced search

Re: FY18 O6 Board Convening Order

COMEVIL: Putting this here, as I can't seem to log in to HYPO. Just my attempts to answer some of the questions you posed and why I think the way I do. Could be wrong, but I think the Navy values CW O5 commanders and gets them to O6 more often than not, like somewhere “near” 100%, although here have...
by yoshi
Wed Jan 25, 2017 12:03 pm
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: FY18 O6 Board Convening Order
Replies: 5
Views: 1443

Re: WHY WE NEED IO......

Specific jobs? I think it's jobs which don't exist, or at least don't exist in the appropriate locations on staffs. Three things needed for the CWO community to be effective and viewed as effective at the COCOMs and on Fleet Staffs. First, CWO community must have/send officers experienced in multipl...
by yoshi
Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:35 am
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: WHY WE NEED IO......
Replies: 31
Views: 4480

Re: WHY WE NEED IO......

Doesn't have to be us doing it, if we're fine with the Army or maybe a SWO (if we're lucky) determining how and when Navy and other service information related capabilities are going to be used, planned, and deconflicted inside that COCOM's AOR. We definitely have our work cut out for us, no doubt i...
by yoshi
Thu Jan 12, 2017 5:40 am
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: WHY WE NEED IO......
Replies: 31
Views: 4480

Re: WHY WE NEED IO......

WE are still saying we do IO in all of our command names and in our billets - not exactly divested. Took a read through the IWC tri-fold. It's clear we still claim to do IO (using everyone else's definition). We even modeled the definition of IW after the definition of IO ("The integrated emplo...
by yoshi
Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:18 am
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: WHY WE NEED IO......
Replies: 31
Views: 4480

Re: WHY WE NEED IO......

Was wondering if/when someone was going to bring up IO in the context of the recent news. Knew also that if it was going to be found, it was only going to be found here. Very important to have this type of discussion, but not in the context of whether or not we do IO. The more important effort is fo...
by yoshi
Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:52 am
 
Forum: Detailer/Community Management Corner
Topic: WHY WE NEED IO......
Replies: 31
Views: 4480

Re: Jun 2016 Lat Transfers into IWC

Congratulations to the selectees! Had the opportunity to talk with and help one of the selectees several months ago. If his selection is any indication of the talent pool, we are embarrassingly wealthy in quality of upcoming JOs. I hope we are up to the challenge of utilizing them properly; in a man...
by yoshi
Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:59 am
 
Forum: Lateral Transfer
Topic: Jun 2016 Lat Transfers into IWC
Replies: 2
Views: 1034

Re: NAVIFOR vs. FCC vs. C10F

Yeah, absolutely - working there is helpful, especially to understand what that organization thinks it does for the Fleet. I don't think administrative functions will ever fully transition to IFOR. Don't believe any of the four communities desire this. Primarily has to do with money, control, and fe...
by yoshi
Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:35 am
 
Forum: Navy Information Warfare
Topic: NAVIFOR vs. FCC vs. C10F
Replies: 13
Views: 2184

Re: NAVIFOR vs. FCC vs. C10F

@O-4s hate me: FCC shouldn't be subordinate to IFOR. FCC is Navy's component to CYBERCOM - operational with the mission of serving as the "central operational authority for networks, cryptologic/signals intelligence, information operations, cyber, electronic warfare, and space capabilities in s...
by yoshi
Sun Dec 04, 2016 2:19 pm
 
Forum: Navy Information Warfare
Topic: NAVIFOR vs. FCC vs. C10F
Replies: 13
Views: 2184

Re: NAVIFOR vs. FCC vs. C10F

The roles and responsibilities of C10F (FCC) and IFOR are well defined for those personnel inside each organization. For the rest of the Navy, however, it's not just confusing, but frustrating. IFOR is supposed to equal admin chain, like the other TYCOMs, except this is only true on a function by fu...
by yoshi
Sun Dec 04, 2016 2:04 pm
 
Forum: Navy Information Warfare
Topic: NAVIFOR vs. FCC vs. C10F
Replies: 13
Views: 2184

Re: IWC Synch

From my experience, the N39 billets often have an N2 in front of them (N2/39) and wind up supporting the 1830 CAPT's efforts rather than having anything to do with planning (in the N3 and N5). On staffs (and particularly #'d Fleet staffs), we must have people in the N5 to add the IWC ingredients to ...
by yoshi
Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:52 am
 
Forum: Navy Information Warfare
Topic: IWC Synch
Replies: 15
Views: 2800
PreviousNext

Return to advanced search

cron