So are you saying the screening to O-5/O-6 Command is somehow different from the screening to O-4 XO/OIC jobs? Because the O-4 XO/OIC screening specifically screens to a bank to avoid the exact situation we're sort of discussing here. Are you sure you're correct in stating that the screenings are d...

So are you saying the screening to O-5/O-6 Command is somehow different from the screening to O-4 XO/OIC jobs? Because the O-4 XO/OIC screening specifically screens to a bank to avoid the exact situation we're sort of discussing here. Are you sure you're correct in stating that the screenings are d...

QIO shouldn't even be in the instruction. It doesn't mean anything, other than an available body with correct timing. It does mean something and apparently needs to be there. Two officers that went to command this year were QIO. The list includes specific names, not just anyone who wasn't selected....

QIO shouldn't even be in the instruction. It doesn't mean anything, other than an available body with correct timing. It does mean something and apparently needs to be there. Two officers that went to command this year were QIO. The list includes specific names, not just anyone who wasn't selected....

Good point. Not to mention the "non-published" O-5 CDR list that's not known until they need someone to take a billet. What if those individuals (unaware that they're on that list) decide to retire or take another position based on retirement plans? How do you plan for that? What exactly ...

Calls have been made. Not sure who they are calling, vice letting find out when the results post.

Case in point: I never got a call about milestone selection but did about command.

Wouldn't it be nice if they let the community know what rules they use?

They are useless because we continue to get the denominator wrong. When I was the OCM (cue the old guy music), I owned the stats and changed the denominator. The denominator was not the number of selects, but the number of people who shared the experience. X of 12 who were CRCs were picked, etc. Su...

sum1: saw a friend describe CWA-66 mission as: 'to provide and deploy trained and ready cryptologic warfare officers and cryptologic technicians to support the collection and exploitation of targets in support of national signals intelligence priorities.' Because: "to create more CDR Command o...

This could make things more interesting: R 091450Z AUG 18 FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 193/18 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/AUG// SUBJ/NOTICE OF CONVENING FY-19 ACTIVE-DU...

navyguy2 wrote:Saying we have too many milestones is different than saying only Flag signed FITREP positions should be milestone.

Who said they should be Flag signed FITREP positions?